Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1485 (DEL)

MONOTECH SYSTEMS LIMITED v. KRIDWINN INNOVATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS

CS(COMM)/998/2024 · 2026-04-14

Jyoti Singh

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CS(COMM) 998/2024 $~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 998/2024 & I.As. 44662/2024, 44664/2024, 47821/2024, 176/2025, 10135/2025 MONOTECH SYSTEMS LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Shalini Kaul, Advocate. versus KRIDWINN INNOVATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS .....Defendants Through: Ms. Cauveri Birbal, Ms. Preksha Gaur, Mr. Kamlendu Pandey, Mr. Kushant and Ms. Nishtha, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 15.04.2026 1. Matter is taken up today as 14.04.2026 was declared holiday on account of birthday of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar vide Notification No. 71/G- 4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 10.04.2026. 2. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff seeking a decree of permanent injunction against the Defendants and all others acting on their behalf from exploiting, copying, divulging, distributing, printing, publishing or using for reference/research/analysis, for development and sale of any products/solutions, rendering any services or in any manner whatsoever handling/dealing with the confidential information/trade secrets of the Plaintiff as defined in Schedule I and II hereto for commercial gain or otherwise, amongst other reliefs. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 13:01:36 CS(COMM) 998/2024 3. During the pendency of the suit, parties were referred for mediation before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where they have amicably settled their inter se disputes and executed a Settlement Agreement dated 10.04.2026, incorporating the terms of settlement, copy of which is handed over in Court and is taken on record. 4. Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful. Accordingly, the suit is decreed in terms of the settlement between the parties, which shall form a part of the decree and terms thereof shall bind the parties thereto. 5. Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 6. Suit along with pending applications stands disposed of. 7. Plaintiff is held entitled to refund of entire court fees in accordance with Court Fees Act, 1870. JYOTI SINGH, J APRIL 15, 2026 S.Sharma This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 13:01:36