Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2024 DAILYLAW 147 (ORI)

SAILESH KUMAR PATTANAYAK v. SOUMYALAGNA PATTNAYAK

RPFAM/313/2024 · 2026-01-08

Sanjay Kumar Mishra

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No.313 of 2024 Sailesh Kumar Pattanayak …. Petitioner Mr. B.P. Panda, Advocate -versus- Soumyalagna Pattanayak & another …. Opposite Parties Mr. K. Patnaik, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA Order No. ORDER 08.01.2026 04. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Mr. Panda, learned Counsel for the Petitioner renders no instruction. He files a memo to the said effect enclosing thereto the intimation given to the Petitioner through Registered Post, which returned unserved with a noting “No such person in this address”, even though the communication was made to the Petitioner in terms of the address available in the cause title of the revision petition. 3. Accordingly, the revision petition stands dismissed due to want of instruction. 4. The memo along with its enclosures, filed in the Court, shall form part of the record. Prasant (S.K. Mishra) Judge Designation: Secretary Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack.