Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No.313 of 2024
Sailesh Kumar Pattanayak …. Petitioner
Mr. B.P. Panda, Advocate -versus- Soumyalagna Pattanayak & another …. Opposite Parties
Mr. K. Patnaik, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Order No.
ORDER 08.01.2026
04.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Mr. Panda, learned Counsel for the Petitioner renders no instruction. He files a memo to the said effect enclosing thereto the intimation given to the Petitioner through Registered Post, which returned unserved with a noting
“No such person in this address”, even though the communication was made to the Petitioner in terms of the address available in the cause title of the revision petition.
3. Accordingly, the revision petition stands dismissed due to want of instruction.
4. The memo along with its enclosures, filed in the Court, shall form part of the record.
Prasant
(S.K. Mishra) Judge
Designation: Secretary Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack.