Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1440 (BOM)

CHAITALI W/O NILKANTH KADAM @ CHAITALI D/O DNYANESHWAR SURASE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/1164/2023 · 2026-06-17

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 913CrWP153.2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 913 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 153 OF 2024 Neelkanth Mangesh Kadam And Others VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another ... Mr. Rameez M. Shaikh - Advocate for the Petitioners Mrs. M. L. Sangit- APP for the State ... WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1164 OF 2023 ... CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. DATED : 17TH JUNE, 2026 PER COURT : - 1. The learned Advocate for the Applicants submits that the cognizance order has been passed by the learned Trial Court and seeks leave to amend the Application in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Pradnya Pranjal Kulkarni vs. State of Maharashtra and Another [Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 13424 of 2025]. 2. Leave to amend is granted. The amendment shall be carried out within a period of two (2) weeks, failing which the Petition shall stand dismissed automatically without reference to the Court. A copy of the charge-sheet shall also be placed on record within a period of two (2) weeks. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE] JUDGE SG Punde Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 17/06/2026 20:20:44