Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.15957 of 2024 Jogendra Nath Gharai ..... Petitioner Mr. R.N. Behera, Advocate General Manager, UCO Bank & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. B.B. Swain, Adv. for Bank. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 06.07.2026 Order No. 07 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court be graciously pleased to issue Rule Nisi calling upon the Opp.parties to show cause as to why the Opp.parties- Bank shall not be directed to refund the deducted amount of Rs.7 lakhs towards closer of the O.D/C.C. Account No.16260505101074 from the Provident Fund Amount and credit the same in his saving Account No. 16670110001073 forth with and in the event the Opp.parties fail to show insufficient or false cause make the Rule Nisi absolute and allow the writ petition with cost; Page 2 of 2. And may further be pleased to pass any other order(s), direction (s) as deem fit and proper to this Hon'ble Court; And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound, shall ever pray.”. 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.3 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Subrat