Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK FAO No.502 of 2024 Khagendra Nath Mohanta ..... Appellant Represented by Adv. - Subhadutta Routray -versus- State Of Odisha and others ..... Respondents Represented by Adv. – Smt. S. Nayak, ASC CORAM: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 01.07.2026 Order No. I.A. No.908 of 2024 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Learned counsel for the Appellant files the receipt in proof of the payment of cost as has been directed to be deposited. Receipt shows that the cost has already been deposited on 1st July, 2026. 3. Accordingly, the delay stands condoned. FAO No.502 of 2018 4. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 5. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the Parties that the issue involved in the present appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court so passed on 19.03.2025 in FAO No.509 of 2014 and batch which was eventually confirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court Page 2 of 2. in SLP (C) No.6943 of 2026 vide order dated 25.03.2026. 6. In view of such submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the present FAO is disposed of in the light of judgment so passed in FAO No.509 of 2014 and batch. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge Sisir Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT