Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1392 (DEL)

PHYSICSWALLAH PRIVATE LIMITED v. MR. VIVEK THAKUR TRADING AS SCHOLARS DEN

CS(COMM)/1074/2024 · 2026-04-06

Jyoti Singh

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CS(COMM) 1074/2024 $~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 1074/2024, I.A. 46979/2024, 48122/2024, 17393/2025 PHYSICSWALLAH PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Kartikeya Tandon, Advocate. versus MR. VIVEK THAKUR TRADING AS SCHOLARS DEN .....Defendant Through: Mr. Ankur Vyas, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 06.04.2026 1. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff seeking a decree for permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, its partners, directors, shareholders or proprietor as the case may be, its assigns in business, franchises, affiliates, subsidiaries, licensees and agents from broadcasting, printing and publishing the Disparaging Advertisements (as set out in paragraph 23 of the Plaint) and Disparaging Marks "SAST A WALLAH" and in any electronic or print media or in any manner which constitutes a violation of Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, disparagement of the Plaintiffs Physics Wallah Marks and business and unfair competition, amongst other reliefs. 2. During the pendency of the suit parties were referred for mediation before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where they have amicably settled their inter se disputes and executed a Settlement This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2026 at 12:37:16 CS(COMM) 1074/2024 Agreement dated 07.02.2026 incorporating the terms of settlement, copy of which has been placed on record. 3. Court has perused the terms of the settlement and finds the same to be lawful. Accordingly, the suit is decreed in terms of the settlement between the parties. 4. Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 5. Suit stands disposed of along with pending applications. 6. Plaintiff is held entitled to refund of entire court fees in accordance with the Court Fees Act, 1870. JYOTI SINGH, J APRIL 6, 2026/YA This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2026 at 12:37:16