Page 1 of 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 23497 of 2024 Minati Bindhani & Ors. ..... Petitioners Mr. S.D. Routray, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 21.05.2026 Order No. 02 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. Petitioners have filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court be graciously pleased to: i) Admit the writ application. ii) Call for the record. iii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ/writs, direction/directions directing the opposite parties more particularly opposite party Nos. 1 & 2 to consider the case of the petitioners for regularization as Nursing Officers in terms of the judgment passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.(C) No.35563/2020 decided on 26.04.2024 (Amaresh Behera and others Versus State of Odisha and others) and further the opposite parties be directed to extend all the consequential service and financial benefits as Page 2 of 3. due and admissible to the petitioners within a stipulated time to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. iv) And/or pass such other order/orders, direction/directions as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper for the ends of justice. And for the said act of kindness, the petitioners as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioners to make fresh individual representations before Opp. Party No. 1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of their claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 4.1. It is observed that, if such individual representations are filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 1 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. 4.2. However, since it is contended that claim of the Petitioners to get the benefit of regularization is covered by an order passed by this Court so upheld now with dismissal of the Writ Appeal in W.A. No. 2659 of 2024, it is observed that, relevancy and effect of the order so confirmed in the Writ Appeal be taken into consideration, while considering the claim of the Petitioners. Petitioners are permitted to provide a copy of this order along with the order passed which has now been confirmed in Writ Appeal No. 2659 of 2024 before Opp. Party No. 1 for compliance. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 1 be communicated to the Petitioners. Page 3 of 3. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha