IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6316 of 2024 ====================================================== Bijay Prasad Sah son of Devendra Prasad Sah, resident of Mahalla-Mirjanhat Road, Police Station-Babarganj, District-Bhagalpur-812005. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Divisional Commissioner, Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur. 4. The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur. 5. Senior Deputy Collector, District Public Grievance Cell, Bhagalpur. 6. The Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Bhagalpur. 7. The Anchal Adhikari, Jagdishpur, Police Staltion-Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur. 8. The S.H.O. Babarganj Police Station, District-Bhagalpur. 9. Ved Prakash Gupta, son of Late Jwala Prasad, resident of Mohaddinagar, Police Station-Babarganj, District-Bhagalpur. 10. Subodh Sah, son of Bodhu Sah, resident of Mohaddinagar, Police Station- Babarganj, District-Bhagalpur. 11. Pinku Modi, son of Bileshwar Modi, resident of Mohaddinagar, Police Station-Babarganj, District-Bhagalpur. 12. Anchala Devi, W/o Pinku Modi, resident of Mohaddinagar, Police Station- Babarganj, District-Bhagalpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate : Ms. Sweety Sinha, Advocate : Mr. Kshem Sharma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Government Pleader (27) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 30-03-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “for issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction upon the concerned Patna High Court CWJC No.6316 of 2024(2) dt.30-03-2026 2/2 respondents especially upon respondent no. 7 and 8, the Anchaladhikari, Jagdishpur and S.H.O. Babarganj Police Station respectively to comply the order and direction of learned Sub- Divisional Officer, Sadar Bhagalpur contained in Letter No. 3935 dated 22.09.2023 so that there may not be any untowards happening at the hands of respondents 2nd party who are adamant to make illegal construction of wall on the raiyati land of the petitioner forcibly. The petitioner further prays to provide proper protection to the petitioner so that respondents 2nd party may not construct illegal wall on the raiyati land of the petitioner.” 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the appropriate authority/court for the redressal of the grievances as the the respondent nos. 9 to 12 are disturbing the peaceful physical possession. 4. Granting said liberty and without commenting on the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U