DEVPRABHA CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED (JV) v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
W.P.(C)/17825/2024 · 2026-04-07
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Writ Petition (Civil)body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1256 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1256 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 17825/2024 and CM APPL. 75880/2024 DEVPRABHA CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED (JV) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Mr. Ajith S Ranganathan, Mr. Rohit Rajershi Mr. Aman Bajaj, Mr. Purushartha Singh and Mr. Siddharth Dua, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr Rohan Jaitley CGSC, Mr Akshay Sharma Adv, Mr Dev Pratap Shahi Adv, Mr. Varun Pratap Singh Adv, Mr Yogya Bhatia, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Rajeev Saxena, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for R-2 and 3.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R %
07.04.2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the stand taken by the respondent no.2 and respondent no. 3 in their counter-affidavit in paragraph no. 7, the petition can be disposed of while binding the said respondents to their assertions that they will not rely on the redacted portion of statement of Mr. Vikas Tikmani. The paragraph no. 7 of the counter- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2026 at 13:12:05
affidavit filed by respondent nos. 2 and 3, is extracted as under:
“7. That, without prejudice and without constituting any precedent, the Deponent hereby submits that the redacted portion of statement of Mr. Vikas Tikmani, an individual of Opposite Party No.6, will not be relied upon by the Respondent No.2 during the course of pending inquiry. This will effectively address the concern of the Petitioner regarding procedural fairness and principles of natural justice.”
2. The respondent nos. 2 and 3 shall remain bound by the aforesaid statement. In view of the aforesaid, the grievance of the petitioner stands mitigated and, accordingly, the petition along with pending application, stands disposed of.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J APRIL 7, 2026 aks This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2026 at 13:12:05