Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2024 DAILYLAW 119 (ORI)

BINAPANI PATTNAIK v. UNION OF INDIA

RVWPET/116/2024 · 2026-02-19

Gourishankar Satapathy, S K Panigrahi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RVWPET No.116 of 2024 Binapani Pattnaik …. Petitioner Mr. S. Pattanaik, Advocate -versus- Union of India and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. M.K. Pati, Sr. Panel Counsel (OPNos.1 to 3) CORAM: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI MR JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY ORDER 19.02.2026 Order No. 04. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. The petitioner, by filing this RVWPET, has made a prayer to review the order dated 09.04.2024 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No. 5962 of 2021. 3. Heard Mr.Saumendra Pattanaik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Manoj Kumar Pati, learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for OPNos.1 to 3 in the matter and perused the record. 4. By the aforesaid order, a Division Bench of this Court has observed the following in paragraph-5, which reads as under: “In view of the above, since the land of the petitioner has not been acquired, question of payment of compensation does not arise. However, if South Eastern Railway, Bilaspur Division is in possession of the land, the petitioner is permitted to pursue her remedy before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.” p. 2 5. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the OPNos.1 to 3, this Court is of the opinion that there is no error apparent on the face of the record to review the order passed by this Court in the writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the RVWPET is dismissed in limine. (Dr.S.K.Panigrahi) Judge (G.Satapathy) Judge Kishore