Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1100 (DEL)

PARVEEN KUMAR v. EXPORT INSPECTION COUNCIL & ORS.

LPA/313/2024 · 2026-01-22

Tejas Karia

Review Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 313/2024 PARVEEN KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Appellant-in-person. versus EXPORT INSPECTION COUNCIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. L.R. Khatana, Advocate for R1 to 4. Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, CGSC with Ms. Gurleen Kaur Waraich and Mr. Kritarth Upadhyay, Advocates for R5/UoI. CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R % 10.02.2026 CM APPL. 9101/2026(Exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The Application stands disposed of. REVIEW PET. 70/2026 3. Heard the Review Petitioner-in-person. 4. This Petition seeks review of the Judgment and Order dated 22.01.2026, whereby LPA No. 313/2024 filed by the Appellant has been dismissed, whereas the connected Review Petition, namely LPA No. 1045/2024, which was filed by the employer-Export Inspection Council has been allowed. 5. It has been contended by the Review Petitioner that though he was innocent, however, by unlawfully conducting the disciplinary proceedings, This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/02/2026 at 13:42:47 he was held to be guilty and this aspect of the matter has not been considered in the Judgment and Order dated 22.01.2026, which is under review. Certain other averments have also been made by the Review Petitioner, such as non-observance of the principle enshrined in Article 311 of the Constitution of India, 1950. As a matter of fact, by filing this Review Petition, the Review Petitioner is seeking rehearing of the matter, which is not permissible. 6. The Review Petitioner has failed to point out any error apparent on the face of records and, accordingly, having regard to the limited scope of the Review Petition, we are not inclined to entertain this Review Petition. 7. The present Review Petition is hereby dismissed. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TEJAS KARIA, J FEBRUARY 10, 2026/sms This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/02/2026 at 13:42:47