p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RVWPET No.129 of 2024 Prasanna Kumar Biswal …. Petitioner Mr. R. Dasmohapatra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Mishra, ASC CORAM: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI MR JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY ORDER 26.03.2026 Order No. 05. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. The petitioner, by filing this RVWPET, has made a prayer to review the order dated 03.04.2024 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No. 22925 of 2018. 3. Heard Mr.Raghunath Dasmohapatra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Sonak Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel in the matter and perused the record. 4. By the aforesaid order, a Division Bench of this Court has observed the following in paragraph-17, which reads as under: “In view of the facts and law, as discussed above, the penalty imposed on the petitioner, being in conformity with the provisions of law, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the same. Consequentially, the order dated 13.08.2013 under Annexure-10 passed by the authority imposing penalty and also the order dated 05.05.2018 passed by the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Bhubaneswar in O.A. No. 2821 of 2013 under Annexure-11 confirming the same do not call any interference by this Court.” p. 2 5. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Standing Counsel, this Court is of the opinion that there is no error apparent on the face of the record to review the order passed by this Court in the writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the RVWPET is dismissed in limine. (Dr.S.K.Panigrahi) Judge (G.Satapathy) Judge Kishore