GHULAM SHAN v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)
WP(C)/3122/2023 · 2026-06-03
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 986 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 986 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 3122/2023 CM(7423/2023).
GHULAM SHAN.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
VERSUS
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS.
…Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Bikram Deep Singh, Dy. AG for R1 to R5. Mr. Z. A. Qureshi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rehana Qayoom, Advocate for R6.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 03.06.2026
01. The record reveals that no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 12.03.2025 and the same position was also on
11.08.2025. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner had caused appearance on 17.12.2025. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
02. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
03. Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 03.06.2026 Bisma Jan.
17 Regular