Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2023 DAILYLAW 986 (JK)

GHULAM SHAN v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)

WP(C)/3122/2023 · 2026-06-03

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 3122/2023 CM(7423/2023). GHULAM SHAN. …Petitioner(s) Through: None. VERSUS UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. …Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Bikram Deep Singh, Dy. AG for R1 to R5. Mr. Z. A. Qureshi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rehana Qayoom, Advocate for R6. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE. ORDER 03.06.2026 01. The record reveals that no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 12.03.2025 and the same position was also on 11.08.2025. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner had caused appearance on 17.12.2025. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 02. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 03. Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE SRINAGAR 03.06.2026 Bisma Jan. 17 Regular