IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No.103 of 2023 Kailash Chandra Nayak …. Petitioner None -versus- Nirupama Parida & anr. …. Opposite Parties CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA Order No. ORDER 29.07.2026 02. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent on call. 3. As pointed out by the Stamp Reporter, instead of filing revision petition, the Petitioner should have preferred CRLMP. However, no step has been taken till date for change of nomenclature from RPFAM to CRLMP. 4. That apart, though the matter was listed on 23.06.2026 before the Lawzima Court, learned Counsel for the Petitioner remained absent. Still three weeks’ time was granted to do the needful, failing which it was ordered to place the matter before the Bench for passing appropriate order. However, today, when the matter is called, the Petitioner remains unrepresented. No steps have been taken till date for change of nomenclature, as pointed out by the Stamp Reporter. 5. Accordingly, the Revision Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution so also for non-removal of defects. Mona (S.K. MISHRA) JUDGE