SURIT BISWANATH SUNA@SURIT BISHWANATH v. NEELIMA PAIK
RPFAM/111/2023 · 2026-07-29
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 923 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 923 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No.111 of 2023
Surit Biswanath Suna @ Surit Bishwanath …. Petitioner
Mr. Sushant Kumar Mohanty, Proxy Counsel -versus- Neelima Paik …. Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Order No.
ORDER 29.07.2026
02.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Though the matter has been listed under the heading “For Orders” for non-taking of steps for change of nomenclature from RPFAM to CRLMP, Mr. Sushant Kumar Mohanty, learned Proxy Counsel, on behalf of Mr. J. Sahu, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits, as per the instruction received, the Petitioner does not want to proceed further in the present case. Accordingly, he prays for withdrawal of the revision petition. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner files a memo to the said effect, bearing signature of Mr. J. Sahu, learned Counsel for the Petitioner in the Court, which is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. p. 2
4. Office is directed to communicate a copy of this
order to the Opposite Party-wife for her information and doing the needful, if any cause of action still survives.
Mona
(S.K. MISHRA) JUDGE