PRIYATAMA MISHRA v. SATYA RANJAN SAHOO, DIRECTOR OF SECY. EDU., H.O.D. BUILDING, BBSR
CONTC/5437/2023 · 2026-07-24
M S Sahoo
Writ Petition (Civil)body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 908 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 908 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.5437 of 2023
Priyatama Mishra …. Petitioner
Ms. P. Padmavati, Advocate
-versus- Satya Ranjan Sahoo, Director, Secondary Education, Odisha …. Opp. Party
Mr. S. Mishra, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Order No.
ORDER 24.07.2026 (Hybrid Mode)
03.
1. The compliance affidavit filed by the opposite party-Director, Secondary Education, Odisha is on record.
Copy of the affidavit has been served on the
learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The learned ASC appearing for the opposite party submits that the order has been complied with which is endorsed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
The learned ASC referring to paragraphs-5 and 6 of the show cause affidavit submits that the unconditional apology tendered by the opposite party
for the delay in complying with the order may be accepted.
3. The apology tendered by the opposite party for the delay in compliance is accepted.
The contempt petition is dropped in view of the compliance of the order dated 23.11.2021 passed in W.P.(C) No.33008 of 2021.
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge
Radha