Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2023 DAILYLAW 905 (JK)

GHULAM MOHD AND OTHERS v. U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPTT AND OTHERS

WP(C)/2410/2023 · 2026-04-28

Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP(C) No. 2410/2023 Page 1 of 2 Sr. No. 108 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2410/2023 Date of Pronouncement:- 28.04.2026 Uploaded on:- 29.04.2026 Ghulam Mohd. and ors. ….Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Nadeem Bhat, Advocate. V/s UT of J&K and ors. …..Respondent(s) Through:- Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG. CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER 1. By this petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek a direction upon respondent Nos. 2 to 6 to restore their revenue record, which has been deleted during settlement proceedings of the Village Sangaldan Moelkote in the year 2008-09, with a further direction upon the said respondents to digitalize the revenue records of the petitioners. 2. Reply stands filed by the respondents, wherein they have admitted that the land of the petitioners has been deleted from the village Sangaldan and inadvertently, the same has not been shown in any village, as such, the case of the petitioners is under consideration and will be rectified. It has also been admitted by the respondents in the reply, so filed, that during digitalization of the record, the land WP(C) No. 2410/2023 Page 2 of 2 of the petitioners has been left and will be rectified on its original number, i.e., in village Sangaldan. 3. In view of the reply filed by the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioners states that since the respondents are in the process to consider the claim of the petitioners, thereby rectifying the mistake committed by the respondents, as such, the petitioners would feel satisfied, if this writ petition is disposed of with a direction upon the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners, thereby rectifying their mistake within a reasonable time. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents states that she is not averse to the proposition made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. Be that as it may, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to rectify the mistake, inadvertently committed by them, thereby restoring the land of the petitioners, which has been deleted from the record of village Sangaldan, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 6. Disposed of along with connected applications, if any. (MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) JUDGE JAMMU 28.04.2026 Ram Krishan Ram Krishan 2026.04.29 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document