GURDAS CHAND AND OTHERS v. U T OF J AND K TH DGP AND OTHERS
CRM(M)/699/2023 · 2026-04-24
Rajnesh Oswal
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 902 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 902 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 699/2023 c/w CRM(M) No.166/2024
Gurdas Chand and others
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) )
Through: None
vs
U. T. of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. P. D. Singh, Dy.AG Mr. Supreet S. Johal, Adv.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 24.04.2026
1. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners for the last two consecutive dates of hearing. The position is not any different even today.
2. It appears that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the present petitions. As such, the present petitions are dismissed for non prosecution.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 24.04.2026 Rakesh
103 Rakesh Kumar 2026.04.24 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu