ZAINA v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS (REVENUE DEPARTMENT )
WP(C)/390/2023 · 2026-04-21
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 897 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 897 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 24 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 390/2023 CM(881/2023) Zaina. …Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, Dy. AG.
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 21.04.2026
01. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 7th April, 2026 and same is the position as on today. It appears that the petitioner is no more interested in prosecuting the instant matter.
02. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
SRINAGAR: 21.04.2026
“HAMID”
Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 21.04.2026