Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2023 DAILYLAW 894 (JK)

MOHAMMAD AYOUB MIR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANR. (HOME DEPARTMENT)

CRM(M)/42/2023 · 2026-04-17

Sanjay Parihar

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 12 REGULAR CAUSE LIST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) 42/2023 MOHAMMAD AYOUB MIR …Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANR. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy AG for R-1 Mr. Baber Bilal, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 17.04.2026 1. It is submitted by the counsel for the respondents that in terms of order impugned, the respondent No. 2 was admitted to interim bail and subsequently in terms of order dated 11.05.2022, the interim bail was made absolute and that the petitioner are in knowledge of the passing of the order of absolute bail but the same has not been questioned. 2. It is further submitted that the final order has not been assailed the order of interim bail having merged with the final order, so nothing survives in this petition. 3. Submissions have relevance because once the interim bail order is made absolute, said order gets merged with the final order and unless the final order is challenged by way of separate proceedings, the petition for assailing the previous order is rendered infructuous. 4. In that background, nothing survives in this petition, the same has been rendered infructuous due to subsequent events. 5. Dismissed, as such, Trial Court informed. (SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 17.04.2026 “S.Nuzhat”