IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4849 of 2023 Date of Decision: 9.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Balwant Singh ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vidushi Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate, for respondent No.3. __________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, fairly states that on account of subsequent development, present petition has become infructuous and same be disposed of accordingly. 2. Ordered accordingly. Liberty is reserved to petitioner to approach appropriate court of law for the surviving grievances, if any. September 9, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge