Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3868 of 2023 1 - Salman Ahmad Niyaji S/o Late Shri Rafik Ahmad Aged About 59 Years Occupation Khand Vistar Prashikshan Officer R/o Village Bilha Thana Bilha Tahsil Bilha District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chandra Kiran Shrivash S/o Late Magal Prasad Shrivas Aged About 58 Years Occupation Parvekshak, R/o Village Bilha Thana Bilha Tahsil Bilha District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Lakhan Lal Dubey S/o Shri Puran Prasad Dubey Aged About 50 Years Occupation Driver R/o Village Bilha Thana Bilha Tahsil Bilha District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Lakheshvar Prasad Kaivrtya S/o Gajanand Kaivrtya Aged About 62 Years Occupation Ward Boy R/o Village Bilha Tahsil Bilha District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 5 - J. D. Manghoghar S/o Jeksandas Manghoghar Aged About 59 Years Occupation Netrasahayak Officer R/o Village Bilha Thana Bilha Tahsil Bilha District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Y. R. Valtar S/o Late Shri Valtar Kumar Aged About 56 Years Occupation Lab Technician R/o Village Bilha Thana Bilha Tahsil Bilha District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Director, Sanchalnalaya Suvasthaya Seva Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI
2 2 - Sayukta Sanchalak, Avigpti Sanchalnalaya Suvasthaya Seva Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sayukta Sanchalak , Sanchalnalaya Suvasthaya Seva Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Chief Medical/ Savasthaya Officer Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Khand Chikitsa Officer Samudayik Savasthaya Kandra Bilha District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from CIS System) For Petitioner : Mr. Abdul Moin Khan, Advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For State : Mr. Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board 08/01/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order under challenge has already been recalled by the respondent authorities and, therefore, at this stage, no grievance survives for the petitioner; consequently, the present petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above submission, the petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Shayna Judge