Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2023 DAILYLAW 831 (UTT)

SOMAY RANGHAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/1094/2023 · 2026-08-10

Alok Mahra

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010193442023 ABA/1094/2023 Somay Ranghar --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Suraiya Naaz, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. 2. Mr. Nikhil Bisht, Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant makes a statement at the Bar that the matter has become infructuous. 4. In such view of the matter, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (Alok Mahra J.) 10.08.2026 Ujjwal