Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2023 DAILYLAW 828 (ORI)

PADMA CHARAN SAHOO v. SUJATA SAHOO

CRLMP/1055/2023 · 2026-07-10

Miss Savitri Ratho

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 1055 of 2023 Padma Charan Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. R. K. Samantaray, Advocate -versus- 1.Sujata Sahoo 2.Soumya Ranjan Sahoo 3.State Govt. of Odisha, Law Department …. Opp. Parties Mr. A. K. Apat, Additional Government Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No. 11. 10.07.2026 (Through hybrid Mode) 1. This CRLMP has been filed to set aside the order dated 08.02.2023 passed in Crl.P. No. 110 of 2022 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Khurda and to transfer the case to the Court of the learned Judge, Family Court-II, Bhubaneswar. 2. This matter is listed in the weekly list. “1. On 25.11.2024, this Court had directed as follows: Taking into account the report of the Registry regarding non-service of notice, since the application cannot be disposed of in the absence of Opposite Parties, the Petitioner is at liberty to serve the notice on them through their counsel appearing before the learned Trial Court on the next date of proceeding. p. 2 2. Registry is requested to call for a report to the said effect from the learned Trial Court. 3. List this matter on 11.12.2024 along with such report.” 3. Fresh requisites have not been filed. However, report has been received from the learned Judge, Family Court, Khurda, where it is stated as the Petitioner has failed to pay the arrear and regular maintenance in Crl.P. No. 110 of 2022 by order dated 31.01.2025, distress warrant as well as NBW has been issued against him which is pending for execution. 4. Till date notice has not been served on the Opposite party and the matter was last listed on 25.11.2024. 5. In view of the report of the learned Judge, Family Court, Khurda, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the CRLMP pending, for which the CRLMP is dismissed. 6. However, dismissal of the case will not preclude the petitioner from challenging any order of the learned Judge, Family Court, Khurda in accordance with law or filing appropriate application for transfer of the case. (Savitri Ratho) Judge Subhalaxmi SAHOO