VINOD KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA TH MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2398/2023 · 2026-02-25
Sanjay Dhar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 826 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 826 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2398/2023
Vinod Kumar
…..Petitioner
Through: None
Vs
Union of India & Ors.
.….Respondents
Through: Mr. R.S. Jamwal, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER (25.02.2026)
01.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed.
02. Today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Same was the position on the last date of hearing as well. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the petition. The same is accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
03. Interim direction/s, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU
25.02.2026
SUNIL
Serial No. 58