SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010188992023 ABA/1068/2023 Adesh Kumar Goyal --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent on'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Nitin Kamal, proxy counsel for Mr. Himanshu Pal, learned counsel for the applicants through Video Conferencing. 2. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Mr. Siddhant Tiwari proxy counsel for Mr. Vivek Pathak, learned counsel for the complainant. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the entire proceedings arising out of the F.I.R., which is the subject matter of the present anticipatory bail application, have been quashed on the basis of a compromise entered into between the parties, therefore, the present bail application has rendered infructuous. 5. Learned counsel for complainant does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 6. In view of the subsequent development, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous. (Alok Mahra, J.) 11.08.2026 Mamta MAM TA RANI Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6a812005bebfcf46f244 f3e584af1449e430ef900bf09a6 d67ebbd642671329b, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=5de1751a4f1d9c abfd54852c9e68911ca8b66dd2 6690a191648ab5d8dd004ef0, cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2026.08.13 11:30:35 +05'30'