p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLREV No.516 of 2023 Lohit Kumar Mangaraj @ Tulu Mangaraj …. Petitioner Ms. D. Mahapatra, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. Rusi Das …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC Mr. R. Mahalik, Adv. (O.P. No.2) CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 03.07.2026 04. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties. 2. This Criminal Revision has been filed challenging order dated 02.09.2023 passed by the learned 3rd Addl. Sessions Judge, Berhampur in G.R. Case No.84 of 2022 [(SC & ST (POA) Act], whereby the application filed by the Petitioner for discharge has been rejected. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that during the pendency, the matter has been settled inter se between the parties and the petition for compromise is on record. 4. In view of the same, the criminal revision is disposed of in the light of the principle as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Gian Chand Garg v. Harpal Singh, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2317, the order dated 02.09.2023 passed by the learned 3rd Add. p. 2 Sessions Judge, Berhampur in G.R. Case No.84 of 2022 [(SC & ST (POA) Act] stands quashed. 5. Accordingly, the CRLREV stands disposed of. (V. Narasingh) Judge Santoshi