Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2023 DAILYLAW 805 (UTT)

ARTI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/486/2023 · 2026-07-21

Alok Mahra

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010097552023 ABA/486/2023 Arti --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate for the applicant. 2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, A.G.A. for the State. 3. Today, learned State Counsel would submit that chargesheet has been filed in the matter, but, applicant is not made an accused in the chargesheet, therefore, nothing survives in the matter. As such, the matter has become infructuous. 4. Since, chargesheet has been filed and applicant is not made an accused in the chargesheet, therefore, the matter has become infructuous. As such, the present anticipatory bail application stands disposed of accordingly. (Alok Mahra J.) 21.07.2026 Ujjwal