Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
UKHC010063372023 ABA/343/2023 Yudhveer Singh --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Susheel Kumar proxy counsel for Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Nikhil Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, would submit that the investigation has been concluded and the final report has already been submitted before the competent court. It is, therefore, contended that the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant does not dispute the aforesaid factual position.
5. In view of the aforesaid, the application for anticipatory bail does not survive after submission of the final report, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
6. Pending applications, if any, also stand
disposed of accordingly.
(Alok Mahra, J.) 17-07-2026 mamta
MAM TA RANI Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6a812005bebfcf46f24 4f3e584af1449e430ef900bf09a 6d67ebbd642671329b, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=5de1751a4f1d9 cabfd54852c9e68911ca8b66d d26690a191648ab5d8dd004ef 0, cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2026.07.18 11:57:18 +05'30'