Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2023 DAILYLAW 794 (UTT)

JAGDISH SINGH YADAV v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/342/2023 · 2026-07-08

Alok Mahra

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010063342023 ABA/342/2023 Jagdish Singh Yadav --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Rajni Rangwal, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the applicant. 2. Mr. Manoj Bhatt, Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has died, therefore, cause of action does not survive in the matter. 4. In such view of the matter, the present anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (Alok Mahra J.) 08.07.2026 Ujjwal