SYED MOHAMMAD AMIN BURQI v. MISS. MANJEET KOUR AND OTHERS
CCP(S)/217/2023 · 2026-02-18
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 791 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 791 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 71 Regular Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 217/2023 in WP(C) 635/2022 SYED MOHAMMAD AMIN BURQI …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Humaira, Advocate vice Mr. Arshad Andrabi, Advocate Vs.
MISS. MANJEET KOUR AND OTHERS
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Zahid Qais Noor, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE.
ORDER 18.02.2026
1. By this petition, petitioner herein has alleged non-compliance of the order dated 01.03.2023, the operative portion of which is reproduced herein below:
“In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed with a direction to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the respondents projecting therein his claim, and on its receipt respondents shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders within one month.”
2. Compliance report stands filed by respondents, it is stated that the representation has been considered, pursuant to the order dated 01.03.2023 passed by this Court. A detailed consideration order has been passed by the respondents on 10.08.2024, wherein the claim of the petitioner has been considered and rejected, being devoid of any merit. Respondents have also placed on record the consideration order dated
10.08.2024.
3. In view of the above, respondents have complied with the order dated 01.03.2023, passed by this Court in its letter and spirit.
4. Contempt proceedings are closed, however liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the consideration order, if he so desires.
(MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 18.02.2026
“Adil Ismail”