Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 20172 of 2023 Alok Mohanty ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Bisoi, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 08.05.2026 Order No. 14 I.A. No.16072 of 2025 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. Considering the grounds taken in the I.A., the prayer for amendment is allowed. 4. Consolidated copy of the Writ Petition filed in Court be placed in the appropriate place. 5. Accordingly, the I.A. stands disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge 15. W.P.(C) No. 20172 of 2023 1. Heard. 2. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, prayed that the Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to admit this application, and direct Page 2 of 2. the opp. Parties that further candidates be shortlisted for the purpose of filling up of the vacant post till all the vacant posts are filled up. And may pass any other order/orders, direction/directions, writ/writs as your lordships deem just and proper; For the act of kindness and grace, the petitioner shall ever pray.” 3. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 4. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 1 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 1 be communicated to the Petitioner. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti