Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2023 DAILYLAW 7657 (DEL)

MITAIGHAR ELIAS AND ORS. v. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

CRL.M.C./2023/2026 · 2026-09-18

Girish Kathpalia

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL.M.C. 2023/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 18.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010103352026 + CRL.M.C. 2023/2026 MITAIGHAR ELIAS AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Deepak Jindal, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State with SI Manoj Kumar Respondent no. 2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 411/2025 of Police Station Janakpuri for offence under Section 333/115(2)/351(2) read with Section 3(5) of BNS on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no. 2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570 996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.18 16:59:45 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:18.09.2026 17:30:40 Signature Not Verified CRL.M.C. 2023/2026 Page 2 of 2 pages 3. The respondent no.2 is present in court today and is identified by IO/SI Manoj Kumar. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by him that he has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. It is also submitted by respondent no. 2 that he did not suffer any noticeable injury except that he felt pain in back. Respondent no.2 submits that now he does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners. I have also seen MLC of respondent no. 2. 4. Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial. 5. Therefore, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 411/2025 of PS Janakpuri for offence under Section 333/115(2)/351(2) read with Section 3(5) of BNS as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 18, 2026 ‘rs’ GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff80 1e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.18 16:59:30 +05'30' By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:18.09.2026 17:30:40