Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2023 DAILYLAW 763 (JK)

UT OF JK THROUGH SDPO JAMMU v. JANAK SINGH AND OTHRS

Crl LP(D)/35/2023 · 2026-02-11

Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sr. No. 22 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Crl LP(D) No. 35/2023 CrlM No. 930/2023 Union Territory of J&K. …. Petitioner(s) Through:- Ms. Pallvi Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG. V/s Janak Singh and ors. …..Respondent(s) Through:- Mr. Prince Khanna, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 11.02.2026 CrlM No. 930/2023 1. The instant application has been filed by the applicant, seeking condonation of delay of 132 days in filing leave to appeal. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 132 days in filing leave to appeal is condoned. 3. Application is, accordingly, disposed of. Crl LP(D) No. 35/2023 4. This is an application, seeking leave to file the appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 04.11.2022 passed by the Court of 1st Additional Sessions Judge in file No. 49/Challan titled, “UT of J&K Vs. Janak Singh and ors.”. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the judgment impugned, we are of the opinion that case for grant of leave to appeal is made out, as there are debatable questions of fact and law involved in the appeal. 2 6. Application is, accordingly, disposed of and leave to file appeal is granted. 7. Registry to diarize the appeal. 8. Heard. 9. Admit. 10. Issue post-admission notice, which is waived by Mr. Prince Khanna, Advocate on behalf of the respondents. 11. List for consideration on 20.04.2026. 12. Meanwhile, send for the record from the Court below. (Sanjay Parihar) (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge Judge JAMMU 11.02.2026 Ram Krishan Ram Krishan 2026.02.12 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document