HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CRM(M) No. 927/2023 c/w CRM(M) No. 1045/2023 Seema Abrol and Ors. ….. Petitioner(s)/ Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Pawan K. Kundal, Advocate q vs UT of J&K and Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. P. D. Singh, Dy. AG Mr. Sudesh Sharma, Advocate Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE ORDER 10.03.2026 01. The petitioners in both the petitions have invoked inherent jurisdiction of this Court for the quashment of respective FIRs No. 119/2023 for offences under Sections 380/457 IPC and 0057/2023 for offences under Sections 498-A, 109 IPC against them on various grounds urged in the memo of petitions. 02. In the interregnum, however, parties have amicably resolved their disputes outside the Court and a compromise in this respect has been placed on record. Statements of the parties, in particular the complainants, at whose instance, FIRs came to be registered have been reduced into writing before learned Registrar Judicial of this Court, whereby they have stated that they have resolved all disputes, issues and misunderstandings and have no objection to the quashment of FIRs. They have been identified by their respective counsels. Sr. No. 115 2 03. In view of the above, both the petitions are allowed and FIRs No. 119/2023 and 0057/2023 are quashed. 04. Both petitions stand disposed of along with connected application(s). 05. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (Rajesh Sekhri) Judge Jammu 10.03.2026 Riya Kochhar