JANARDAN PRASAD BALUNI v. MAJOR PRAMOD KUMAR VOHRA
CLR/142/2023 · 2026-05-08
Subhash Upadhyay
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 758 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 758 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
CLR No.142 of 2023 Hon'ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.
1. None is present for the revisionist.
2. Mr. Siddhartha Singh and Mr. Subhang Dobhal, learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Perusal of order sheet reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the revisionist on 13.03.2026 and 24.04.2026.
4. There is no representation on behalf of the revisionist today even in the revised call, accordingly, the present revision is dismissed in default.
(Subhash Upadhyay, J.) 08-05-2026
Kaushal