IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 24 of 2023 Decided on : 12.03.2026 Hari Ram ...Petitioner Versus Bhikam Ram & another ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Tejasvi Verma, Advocate, vice Lalit Sehgal, Advocate, for the petitioner. For the Respondents : Ms. Mamta Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent No.2/State. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has produced the receipt issued by Member Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, regarding the deposit of ₹6,750/- being the 15% of the cheque amount. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1/complainant , under instructions, submits that 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 parties have entered into compromise and complainant/respondent No.1 does not want to proceed further with the revision in view of the compromise effected between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amount of ₹70,000/- deposited before this Registry, is to be disbursed to the complainant/respondent No.1. It is ordered the amount of ₹70,000/- be disbursed to the complainant/respondent No.1 by remitting the same to his savings bank account on furnishing of the bank account details, if not furnished earlier. No other amount has been deposited before any other Court. 4. In view of these facts, the present revision is allowed and the judgment passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. on 25.11.2022 in Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 2019 titled Hari Ram vs. Bhikham Ram, & another affirming the judgment of conviction dated 08.08.2019 and order of sentence dated 06.09.2019, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chachiot at Gohar, District Mandi, H.P. . in Criminal Complaint No. 238-1/2018/22-III/2019 titled Bhikham Ram vs. Hari Ram are ordered to be set aside. 3 5. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 12th March, 2026. (ravinder)