PARBHAT SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/7850/2023 · 2026-03-18
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 740 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 740 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7850 of 2023 Decided on: 18.03.2026 Parbhat Singh and others …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Amrinder Singh Rana, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 5. Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No. 6 to 9. Respondent No.10 is ex parte. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Following order was passed in the matter on 16.09.2025:-
“Today, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the private respondents, on instructions, informed the Court that the cause title has become defective. In order to clarify this fact by learned Counsel for the petitioners and the fact that petitioners No.2 and 3 express their desire not to continue with the petition, as prayed for, list on 24.09.2025.”
2. The above order takes note of the fact that petitioners No. 2 & 3 had expressed their desire not to continue with the petition. Matter thereafter appeared on 24.09.2025 when following order was passed:- 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2
“Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some time be granted to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased petitioner. As prayed for, last opportunity of three weeks is granted to do the needful. List thereafter.”
3. As evident from the above order, final opportunity of three weeks was granted for bringing on record legal representatives of deceased petitioner No.1. More than five months have gone by but the opportunity in terms of order dated 24.09.2025 has not been availed by the legal representatives of deceased petitioner No.1. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua March 18, 2026
Judge yogesh