$~77 & 78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 189/2023 SONY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Decree Holder Through: Mr. Rajat Joneja, Ms. Himanshi Madan & Mr. Anmol Kumar, Advs. versus CORPORATE SERVICE PLAN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rohan Khanna & Mr. Arvind Singh Yadav, Advs. + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 299/2023 SONY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Joneja, Ms. Himanshi Madan & Mr. Anmol Kumar, Advs. versus CORPORATE SERVICE PLAN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rohan Khanna & Mr. Arvind Singh Yadav, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN O R D E R % 21.07.2026 1. These cases are listed today for directions. 2. The backdrop is that the files of these cases were sent by the Registry for updating the status as the judgment in the connected matter was already pronounced on 29.04.2026. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 12:23:56 3. Perusal of the files reveals that judgments in these cases were signed and uploaded but in the record of the Registry the status of these cases were showing pending. The Court Master was asked to submit an explanation. The response submitted is that the judgments in (O.M.P.)(COMM) 410/2023, OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 189/2023 and O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 299/2023 were pronounced on 29.04.2026 in the presence of learned counsel for the parties. Inadvertently, the listing parcha was sent only for (O.M.P.)(COMM) 410/2023 and not for other two cases. 4. From the perusal of the file and the explanation of the Court Master it is forthcoming that the judgments in (O.M.P.)(COMM) 410/2023, OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 189/2023 and O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 299/2023 were reserved on 10.04.2026 and the pronouncement of (O.M.P.)(COMM) 410/2023 was listed for 29.04.2026. On that date, all the judgements were pronounced in open court in the presence of learned counsel for the parties. (O.M.P.)(COMM) 410/2023 was allowed and the arbitral award was set aside, consequent thereto the execution petition and the petition under Section 9 of the Act were rendered infructuous. The judgements were signed and uploaded. Hence, no further orders are called for. The Court Master is directed to remain vigilant in the future. 5. These petitions stand disposed of. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JULY 21, 2026 Ch This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 12:23:56