Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2023 DAILYLAW 734 (UTT)

DEEPAK BATHAM v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY OF HOME AFFAIRS, U.K. GOVT. DEHRADUN

SPLA/102/2023 · 2026-04-21

Ashish Naithani

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

21. BA] SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS SPLA No.102 of 2023 With CRLA No.302 of 2023 Deepak Batham Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Another Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Ms. Poonam Rauthan, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Rajat Mittal, learned counsel for the Appellant. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned AGA for the State. 3. As per office report dated 20.04.2026 service is considered to be sufficient regarding respondent nos.2, 3 & 4 yet there is no representation on their behalf. 4. Heard. 5. Leave to appeal is granted. 6. Admit. 7. Summon the lower court record. 8. Let the objection be filed by the State within two weeks. 9. Registry is directed to prepare the paper book and supply the same to the concerned parties, as per Rules. 10. List this appeal on 30.05.2026 for final hearing. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 21.04.2026 Arti