1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8904 of 2023 1 - Jitendra Kumar Gahwai S/o Shri Chhotelal Gahwai Aged About 37 Years R/o Infront Of Basant Complex, Near Sarkanda, Seepat Road, Bilapsur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Directorate Health Services, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Divisional Joint Director Health Services, Regional Health And Family Welfare Training Centre Parishar, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Collector Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Chief Medical And Health Officer Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Dr. Anil Shrivastava Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 7 - Monika Sahu Assistant Grade- I I I, Posted In The Office Of Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.P.S. Gandhi, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Ms. Vartika Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 23/01/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the relevant attendance register from the respondent no. 5 for kind perusal. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly further pleased to issue the writ order or directions to the respondent authorities to take an appropriate action against the respondent No 6 & 7 and be corrected the attendance of the petitioner and granted the necessary benefits on such, peried. 10.3 That any other relief may also be granted as may deem fit by the Hon'ble Court as per the facts and circumstances.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of the subsequent developments, the petitioner does not want to pursue the petition any further. It is further submitted that, as reflected in 3 paragraphs No. 8 and 9 of the reply filed on behalf of the State, the grievances raised by the petitioner in the present petition have already been duly considered and effectively redressed by the competent authorities, and therefore no cause of action survives for adjudication by this Hon’ble Court. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, nothing remains to be adjudicated, and the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat