Narender Singh Parmar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh Cr. Revision No.588 of 2023 27.02.2026 Present Mr. Trigun Singh Negi, Advocate vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent-State. Cr.MP No.598 of 2026 By way of instant application, prayer has been made on behalf of the applicant for impleadment of the complainant in FIR No.98 of 2019. No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-applicant/respondent. Learned Additional Advocate General fairly states that impleadment of the complainant would not prejudice any party to the lis, rather his impleadment as a party respondent would facilitate proper and effective adjudication of the case. In view of the fair stand taken by learned Additional Advocate General, the present application is allowed and complainant named in para-3 of the application is ordered to be impleaded as party respondent. Registry is directed to carry out necessary correction in the memo of the parties on the basis of amended memo of parties to be filed by learned counsel for the applicant within a period of two weeks. The application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision No.588 of 2023 Notice be issued to the complainant, returnable within a period of four weeks, on taking steps within one week. (Sandeep Sharma) Judge February 27, 2026 (shankar)