Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2023 DAILYLAW 709 (UTT)

RASHID v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA2/346/2023 · 2026-02-12

Ravindra Maithani

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 39 BA2 No.346 of 2023 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Vivek Pathak, Advocate holding brief of Mr. K.R. Gazi, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State. At the very outset, learned State Counsel submits that the bail application has rendered infructuous because the trial has already been concluded and the applicant has been acquitted. The bail application is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 12.02.2026 RV