Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPMS No.1708 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
3. Mr. Piyush Garg and Mr. Mukesh Singh Rawat,
learned counsel for respondent no.4.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at bar that the writ petition involved suspension of Village Pradhan. The term of the petitioner as Village Pradhan has come to end, therefore, the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
09.02.2026 AK
2