MIRZA ABU HUSSAIN @ MERZA ABU HUSSAIN v. STATE OF ODISHA
WP(C)/20468/2023 · 2026-04-15
Chittaranjan Dash
Writ Petition (Civil)body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 706 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 706 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.20468 of 2023
Mirza Abu Hussain @ Merza Abu Hussain …. Petitioner Mr. Samaya Kumar Ray, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Satya Brata Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
Order No.
ORDER 15.04.2026
01.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. By means of this application, the Petitioner seeks the following relief:
“The petitioner therefore humbly prayed that this Hon’ble court would graciously be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamous Or any other suitable writ/writ(s) directing to the opp. party No;1 2 as the Tahasildar, Dasarathpur to file 15 (b) of the O.S.S. Act before the learned Addl. Commissioner of Land Records and Settlement, Collectorate, Jaipur in Hal Khata No.355, Hal Plot No. 705 Area A0.12 dec. in Mouza - Prakatpur, P.S.Mangalpur, Dist.Jajpur against the Hal E.O,E. Holders;”
3. Having regard to the nature of the relief sought and the submission made by learned counsel, the Petitioner is required to approach the appropriate authority under the statute. Liberty is accordingly granted to the Petitioner to file an appropriate application before the competent authority. The period spent in p. 2 prosecuting the present writ petition may be considered for exclusion while computing the period of limitation.
4. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.
(Chittaranjan Dash) Judge
AKPradhan Designation: Senior Stenographer