Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2023 DAILYLAW 677 (ORI)

HEMANTA KUMAR SAHOO v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/13897/2023 · 2026-03-13

Chittaranjan Dash

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P(C) No. 13897 of 2023 Hemanta Kumar Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. J.R. Kar, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. J.K. Khandayatray, ASC CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No. ORDER 13.03.2026 01. 1. By means of this application, the Petitioner seeks the following relief:- “Therefore, it is humbly prayed that Your Lordship’s would be graciously pleased to issue a Rule “NISI” in the nature of writ of Mandamus / Certiorari or any other appropriate writ / writs directing the Tahasildar, Kantapada, the Opp. party No. 3 to issue a separate record-of-right in favour of Petitioner in respect of the purchase land of his father within a stipulated period of time by implementing the common order dated 01.09.2021 in Revision Petition bearing R.P. No. 613 & 695 of 2020 passed by the Opp. party No. 2, the learned Additional Commissioner, Settlement and Consolidation, Cuttack as Annexure-1.” 2. As emerges from the application, the matter having been brought before the Addl. Commissioner, Settlement and Consolidation, Cuttack in Revision Petition Nos.613 & 695 of 2020, the Addl. Commissioner, Settlement and Consolidation passed the order on 01.09.2021, allowing the prayer of the Petitioner directing the Tahasildar, Kantapada to correct the Hal Settlement Record-of-Right pertaining to an area Ac0.21 dec. 6½ kadi, in favour of the Petitioner in a separate khata and plot after carving of the purchased area from Hal Settlement Plot No.222 from the impugned Hal Settlement Khata No.167. 3. Accordingly, the Opp. Party No.3, i.e. Tahasildar, Kantapada is directed to implement the order as mandated in the order of the learned Addl. Commissioner, Settlement and Consolidation, Cuttack dated 01.09.2021, if it has not been implemented in the meanwhile within a period of eight weeks and communicate it to the Petitioner a week thereafter. 4. A free copy of this order be supplied to the learned ASC for onward communication to the authority concerned to ensure compliance. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Chittaranjan Dash) Judge Sarbani Designation: Junior Stenographer