IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.13827 of 2023 Rajanikanta Desinayak …. Petitioner Mr. N. Rath, Adv. -versus- MD, OFDC Ltd., BBSR & Anr. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC COROM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 05.03.2026 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ application, issue rule Nisi calling upon the opp. parties to show cause as to why the prayers made hereunder be not allowed, Upon showing insufficient cause/ no cause make the said Rule absolute, Issue writ/ writs in the nature of i. the a writ of Mandamus quashing revocation vide order dtd.30.12.2022 as at Annexure-5 reverting the petitioner to his feeder cadre post, declaring the same to be illegal, unconstitutional and dehors the statutory rules. ii. And to direct the authorities as to why the impugned order Dt.30.12.2022 would not be p. 2 p. 2 quashed, and to promote the petitioner to the post Deputy Manager (AM) from the date of joining in the promotional post i.e 27.12.2022 extending benefit of promotion with all service and financial benefits. iii. And/or may pass such other writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions as this Hon'ble Court may think fit and proper for the ends of justice. And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner state that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-6 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-6 in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Jyoti