M/S TAMTA CONSTRUCTION CO.PVT LTD v. RAM PUKAR SINGH
RFA/234/2023 · 2026-04-21
Neena Bansal Krishna
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 6527 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 6527 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 234/2023, CM APPL. 13622/2023
M/S TAMTA CONSTRUCTION CO.PVT LTD .....Appellant
Through: None.
versus
RAM PUKAR SINGH
.....Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R %
21.04.2026
1. None had appeared on behalf of the Appellant on the previous date before the learned Joint Registrar, nor anyone has appeared today.
2. No steps taken for service of the Respondent and the Decretal amount has also not been deposited in terms of Order of this Court.
3. The present Appeal is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J APRIL 21, 2026 va
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 13:42:02