CRM-M-31224-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 275 NEERAJ YADAV STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) 1. Sections 115 2023, Police Station consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 15.05.2 2. learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with regard to compro 1 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH YADAV AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Mr. Bhupinder Ghangas, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryan Mr. Jonti Phogat, Advocate for Mr. Anil Chahal, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5. *** Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 5, 190, 191(2), 333 and 351(2 Police Station Civil Lines, Bhiwa consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise 2026. On 29.05.2026, this Court directed the parties to appear before learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with regard to compromise dated 15.05.2026. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31224-2026 Date of decision: 10.09.2026 …PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Advocate na. quashing of FIR No.58 dated 13.03.2026 under 2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, ani, District Bhiwani, and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise this Court directed the parties to appear before learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with .2026 under , and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise this Court directed the parties to appear before learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with JYOTI 2026.09.10 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-31224-2 3. learned Add Statement of Investigating Officer 10.06.2026. Ludhiana has submitted have entered into a valid compromise without any influence or coercion. Point-wise report as under has been submitted: persons namely Ravinder son of Prem Parkash (complainant), 2 2026 In compliance of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before ditional Chief Judicial Magistrate Statement of Investigating Officer ASI R Learned Additional Chief J has submitted his report recording satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without any influence or coercion. wise report as under has been submitted: “1. That in the present FIR, six accused persons namely Neeraj Yadav son of Manoj Kumar, Mangopal @ Gopal son of Manoj Kumar (minor), Sudha wife of Mukesh, Sanjogta wife of Manoj Kumar, Mukesh son of Mahender Singh and Manoj Kumar son of Mahender Singh (petitioners), all residents of House No. 66, Kripa Ram Ki Dhani Rohtak Gate, Bhiwani are arraigned, and in the course of investigation, Sudha wife of Mukesh and Sanjogta wife of Manoj found innocent and they are kept in the column No. 12 of the challan, which is yet to be filec. All the accused persons named above appeared before this Court and made thei statement about compromise. No accused is absconding/proclaimed person in this case 2. that in the present case, R resident of Kripa Ram Ki Dhani, Rohtak Gate, Bhiwani (respon lent No. 2) is complainant and in the present FIR, total four persons namely Ravinder son of Prem Parkash (complainant), Prem Parkash son of Ram Saroop, Krishna wife of Prem In compliance of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before Magistrate, Bhiwani on 02.06.2026. Rajesh was also recorded on Judicial Magistrate, Bhiwani, report recording satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without any influence or coercion. wise report as under has been submitted: hat in the present FIR, six accused persons namely Neeraj Yadav son of Manoj Kumar, Mangopal @ Gopal son of Manoj Kumar (minor), Sudha wife of Mukesh, Sanjogta wife of Manoj r, Mukesh son of Mahender Singh and Manoj Kumar son of Mahender Singh (petitioners), all residents of House No. 66, Kripa Ram Ki Dhani Rohtak Gate, Bhiwani are arraigned, and in the course of investigation, Sudha wife of Mukesh and ound innocent and they are kept in the column No. 12 of the challan, which is yet to be filec. All the accused persons named above appeared before this Court and made thei statement about compromise. No accused is absconding/proclaimed person in this case. Ravinder son of Prem Parkash, resident of Kripa Ram Ki Dhani, Rohtak Gate, Bhiwani (respon lent No. 2) is complainant and in the present FIR, total four persons namely Ravinder son of Prem Parkash (complainant), Prem Parkash son of Ram Saroop, Krishna wife of Prem In compliance of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before .2026. recorded on , report recording satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without any influence or coercion. hat in the present FIR, six accused persons namely Neeraj Yadav son of Manoj Kumar, Mangopal @ Gopal son of Manoj Kumar (minor), Sudha wife of Mukesh, Sanjogta wife of Manoj r, Mukesh son of Mahender Singh and Manoj Kumar son of Mahender Singh (petitioners), all residents of House No. 66, Kripa Ram Ki Dhani Rohtak Gate, Bhiwani are arraigned, and in the course of investigation, Sudha wife of Mukesh and ound innocent and they are kept in the column No. 12 of the challan, which is yet to be filec. All the accused persons named above appeared before this Court and made thei statement about compromise. No accused is , resident of Kripa Ram Ki Dhani, Rohtak Gate, Bhiwani (respon lent No. 2) is complainant and in the present FIR, total four persons namely Ravinder son of Prem Parkash (complainant), Prem Parkash son of Ram Saroop, Krishna wife of Prem JYOTI 2026.09.10 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-31224-2 4. factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. 5. Judgment of this Court in and another” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 “Gian Singh Ve petition is allowed. 6. 333 and 351 Lines, Bhiwa 3 2026 Parkash and Parmod son of Prem Parkash are injured and all of them are aggrieved persons and all of them appeared for making statement about compromise. (3) that the trial in this case has not been started as the challan is yet to be filed. (4) that the compromise betwee respondent No. 2 to 5 (accused persons and complainant party) is voluntarily, an without any fear, pressure and greed, misrepresentation, coercion an undue influence etc. and is result of free will of parties. (5) that no any other criminal case is pending against the accused persons.” Learned State counsel has not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. Following principles of law laid down by the Full Bench Judgment of this Court in “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 “Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others”(2012) 10 SCC 303 petition is allowed. FIR No.58 dated 13.03.2026 under Sections 1(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanh ani, District Bhiwani, and all consequential proceedings son of Prem Parkash are injured and all of them are aggrieved persons and all of them appeared for making statement about compromise. hat the trial in this case has not been started as the challan (4) that the compromise between the petitioners and pondent No. 2 to 5 (accused persons and complainant party) is voluntarily, an without any fear, pressure and greed, misrepresentation, coercion an undue influence etc. and is criminal case is pending against the not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. Following principles of law laid down by the Full Bench “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Hon’ble Supreme Court in rsus State of Punjab and others”(2012) 10 SCC 303, the under Sections 115, 190, 191(2), hita, 2023, Police Station Civil and all consequential proceedings arising son of Prem Parkash are injured and all of them are aggrieved persons and all of them appeared for hat the trial in this case has not been started as the challan n the petitioners and pondent No. 2 to 5 (accused persons and complainant party) is voluntarily, an without any fear, pressure and greed, misrepresentation, coercion an undue influence etc. and is criminal case is pending against the not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, Following principles of law laid down by the Full Bench “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and Hon’ble Supreme Court in the , l arising JYOTI 2026.09.10 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-31224-2 therefrom, are quashed qua the 15.05.2026. 7. 10.09.2026 Jyoti-V 4 2026 therefrom, are quashed qua the petitioners, on the basis of compromise dated Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable : , on the basis of compromise dated Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No , on the basis of compromise dated (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JYOTI 2026.09.10 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document