IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3446/2023 Decided on: 19.03.2026 Dr. Ram Krishan Shandil & Anr. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Suneet Goel, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 3 to 6. Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.2. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief: - “B. Direct the respondents to restore the main gate to the petitioners’ institutions/building in Khasra No.1332, restore/re- erect the iron sheet fencing erected by the petitioners abutting Khasra No. 4; and restore the damage caused to the slab in Khasra No.8 forthwith.” 2. Even though separate replies have been filed by the respondents, at the very outset, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 instant petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of their grievances, in accordance with law, before the appropriate forum. 3. Without commenting upon the merits of the matter and keeping all rights & contentions of the parties open, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. The period spent in pursuing the instant petition shall not be computed for the purposes of limitation. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 19th March, 2026(rohit)